Thread Rating:
- 0 Votes - 0 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
are books really better than the movies?
|
| Author |
Message |
silvermyst
Hiding Tiger
  
Posts: 119
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 0
Amped Points: 247
|
RE: are books really better than the movies?
YES. Period.
Books are definitely better than the movies especially if the movie is adapted from 'em because most of the time they cut out important things. For example, in the Lord of the Rings movie, they did not include Tom Bombadil, that great man of the forest, the only one who the ring had no power over.. i think that was a pretty important part.
In the Harry Potter movies, well, I was quite disappointed with the 3rd movie (what can I expect from that new director, no offense). They cut a few important things too. Can't blame 'em.. the movie might become too draggy.
The Notebook and A Walk to Remember are better read first.
I haven't watched Devil Wears Prada, Eragon or Chronicles of Narnia though so I can't compare yet. Oh, and there's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
"When you want to make a difference,
SUBTRACT. "
|
|
| 11-25-2007 07:58 AM |
|
|